Troll Hunter (Trolljegeren)

 

If you go down to the cinema today you’ll be sure of a big surprise, well, particularly if you go to see ‘Troll Hunter’. Since it is not on very wide release it may require some time to find a cinema that hosts the film, but it is worth going to see this smart and well shot Norwegian flick as it is consistently entertaining. The biggest surprise comes from the fact it was made on a budget of $3 million (19,900,000 NK), which to put into context is 1/65^th of the budget for the new Transformers movie which cost $195 million to make.

‘Troll Hunter’ uses the well worn found footage gimmick with hand held camera shots, but adds new life to this old method of adding ‘realism’. The film uses the best points of past releases, such as the teens in the wood set up of ‘The Blair Witch Project’ as well as the CGI monsters a la ‘Cloverfield’. This combination of different techniques makes the film feel fresh and original. The teenagers in the woods are Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen), Johanna (Johanna Mørck) and Tomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), three film students who start to follow the suspected poacher Hans (Otto Jespersen) until they find out he actually hunts trolls (the CGI monsters in question). It turns out that not only are trolls real, but the Norwegian government knows about them and wants to keep them secret, though it is never explained why they bother keeping them alive at all.

The concept of the film is inspired: taking the well known Norwegian export of troll myths and presenting it as if it might be a possibility. A lot of thought was clearly put into rationalising the myths, such as how an animal could biologically be allergic to sunlight, as well as how they may look and act if they were truly alive. Every troll, and you get to meet a good number of them, looks both fantastically mythical, but also realistic. The director cleverly uses night vision shots in order to keep the realism of the trolls intact even though the budget is only a fraction of other films released.

As well as the trolls being well researched and thought through, the government agency in charge of them (the troll security service or TSS) that has the feeling of legitimacy that only comes when the film subject has been properly and fully researched. The TSS was full of men in suits, forms that needed to be filled in and cheap outsourcing- all the embodiments of bureaucracy. Hans is the most interesting character. Being the only troll hunter in the TSS he is a disgruntled employee who hates the long hours and bad pay, yet still strongly believes in what he is doing. He may not look it, but Hans has a deeper, understanding side that Otto Jespersen brings out,very impressively when you consider that Jespersen is originally a controversial Norwegian comedian

The pacing of the film has been well set with the slower parts that set the scene at the start quickly leading towards large scale action. What easily makes this film great is how audiences are shown a troll within the first third of the film, there is none of the teasing or alluding to what they might look like. This works out well, because then audiences are not disappointed by what they are shown (unlike what happened to a certain cloud of black smoke). The slower parts may not go into the characters as much as they were probably designed to, but as soon as the running starts (beware of the motion sickness at these points) the film doesn’t easily let up until the final credits roll. However, not all the scenes are hard and fast action, the film certainly as a more comedic side as well. There are scenes placed between the running that make you smile and not take it all a little too seriously. Whether it is having men in suits haggling over the prices of dead bears or Hans using three billy-goats to lure out a troll under a bridge this light bit of humour means that ‘Troll Hunter’ is not the doom and gloom that you are used to with ‘found footage’ films.

Overall ‘Troll Hunter’ is not like many films out at the moment as it does not have a well known cast or huge budgets, but it has the balls to try and break into cinemas outside of Norway and that should be recognised. In the end it is a film that everyone needs to see in order to appreciate what can still be done with a camera and computer and without the clout that Hollywood has.

Degree- 2:1

An enjoyable film that pushes what can be done 

on a budget and makes audiences realise how 

much we should ask for from the big movie studios.

(If you are confused about the rating system please click on the ‘About This Blog Page’ which will explain it all)

X-Men First Class

 

As a self-confessed geek and huge X-Men fan, I have wasted many an hour or two reading through countless Wikipedia pages on all the characters from my favourites to the lesser known ones, so I was extremely excited about the up coming prequel. Having been disappointed both by ‘X3-The Last Stand’ and embarrassed by ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’ I was optimistic when I saw the names Matthew Vaughn (who directed ‘Kick Ass’), Jane Goldman (who helped adapt ‘Kick Ass’) and Bryan Singer (the director of the first two X-Men films). Needless to say, my expectations were met and, in some areas, surpassed.

Set in the 1960s, ‘X-Men: First Class’ has gone back to basics to create an origin of one of the most fascinating relationships in the franchise – the one between Charles Xavier (James McAvoy) and Erik Lehnsherr (Michael Fassbender). As well as their relationship, the film focuses on how Xavier becomes Professor X, the world’s most powerful telepath, and Lehnsherr becomes Magneto, a man who can control magnetic fields and thus manipulate metal. Set during the real-life event of the Cuban missile crisis, the story concentrates on the first coming-out of mutants to the not only the rest of the world, but also to each other. Lehnsherr’s is the first power we see manifest and audiences are given an insight into his anger and drive; how he survived a Nazi concentration camp as a young boy (fan boys will notice how Singer’s original opening to ‘X-Men’ was used) and his powers stem from the emotional hardship he suffered. Seeing Lehnsherr’s origins allows us to understand how his later philosophy of mutants above humans does not come from being innately evil, but from his own negative experiences of the world, many of them cruel and unbending. As the film goes on Lehnsherr transforms from a volatile loner to a calm, magnetic (excuse the pun) leader that we recognize as the Magneto immortalized by Sir Ian McKellen. Fassbender plays a brilliant young Magneto, who is stylish, ruthless and takes no prisoners. It would not come as a surprise if Fassbender became the next James Bond as he skillfully manages to give feeling and depth to what some might describe as an unrepentant character. He also manages to make turtle necks look suave and menacing, which is no mean feat by any means.

Xavier’s transformation to the serene mentor played by Sir Patrick Stewart is a little more obvious, and slightly poorly handled. At the start Xavier is a confident arrogant DPhil student (well what DPhil students aren’t?) studying genetics at Oxford University and using his powers for his own personal pleasure, such as reading the mind of a girl to find out her favourite drink. However, upon finding the existence of other mutants besides himself, and realizing that they need to be looked after, he grows up and willingly accepts his responsibility as a mutant mentor. This transformation doesn’t feel fully believable, most likely because McAvoy lacks the gravitas to pull off the serious act. He is much better playing the annoying playboy than serious grown up.

As well as Charles Xavier and Erik Lehnsherr, ‘X-Men: First Class’ includes a list of characters that fans of the original comic books will enjoy. The strongest, most interesting and best written one is easily Raven, who will come to be known as the blue shape-shifter, Mystique. In the original movies Mystique was many people’s favourite due to her refusal to hide her difference, even though she easily could, in this prequel we see how this determination develops. Originally she hides her mutant ability and assumes the look of the normal, albeit beautiful, Jennifer Lawrence, but as the film progresses she is shown to question whether she should have to hide. What makes her part in the film even more interesting is how she creates a kind of love triangle with Xavier and Lehnsherr. She starts off following Xavier, but audiences all know she will change her allegiance if she is to be on Magneto’s side at the start of the first X-Men.  Watching the two men battle for her support adds extra tension to a relationship that already has two strong egos believing they are right.

The second supporting character to add to the characterization and depth of the film is another blue fan favourite, Hank McCoy, later known as Beast. Although in his blue bestial form when played by Kelsey Grammer in ‘X3: The Last Stand’ in this prequel he still has his human form and is played by Nicholas Hoult. What is interesting about McCoy’s character is he is not as selfless as the rest of the team and desperately wants to make his monkey-like feet normal again. For once, it is nice to see a superhero that reacts in a normal, slightly superficial, way to his situation in a way that reflects how audiences might also react. It would be great to say that the rest of the X team are as well developed and as well written as Mystique and Beast, however, this is sadly not the case. Whether it is the fault of the script for not giving them more depth or the fault of the original source material for not providing enough to work with, the rest of the students from Mutant High feel like add-ons. It seems that they are only there to fill up the fight scenes. It could be argued that out of the hundreds of characters that could have been picked, Jane Goldman and her team should have chosen more filled out ones.

If some of the characters in the X-team let the side down, Kevin Bacon’s Sebastian Shaw – a mutant who can absorb energy – and January Jones’ Emma Frost – a telepath who can also turn her skin into diamonds – are certainly enemies who bring it back up. Both actors ooze the natural sophistication and glamour that is associated with wealth in the 60s. Because of this they are a delight to watch and part of you will want them to succeed in their plot because they just look so good doing it.

Unlike many comic book films released at the moment (Green Lantern comes to mind…) ‘X-Men: Fist Class’ is character and plot driven over the special effects. Truth be told, some of the CGI is not up to scratch with most summer blockbusters; maybe blue is a difficult colour to use, but both Mystique and Beast have looked better in previous incarnations and Emma Frost’s diamond skin looked a little cheap. But if these faults have come because more time was spent neatening up the script, then they are a worthy price to pay so that the film breaks away from being a normal comic book adaption. Saying this, there are still enough little bits of comic trivia for fans. From jokes about Xavier’s hair to the appearance of two stars from the original three films, these little in jokes will keep fans happy. However, the studio did take a few artistic licenses that some fans may not be happy with.  For example, likely due to American audiences being unable to understand British accents (commiserations Ms Cole) both Banshee and Moira McTagart have lost their heavily accented heritage to become clean spoken Americans. Although this may seem a little petty to complain about, this is just the sort of things that fans will pick up on and get annoyed about.

Although some aspects of the film have been changed for better or for worse, the premise is still very much pride of the underdog. ‘Mutant Pride’ is constantly and unsubtly mentioned, but really the word ‘mutant’ could be replaced by any minority or down trodden group – gay pride, female pride, geek pride. This is the very essence of what X-Men is about: who the fan base is. And that is what has made it become so successful. People enjoy X-Men because it shows that being born different doesn’t mean you are born unequal, and it is fantastic that this mantra shines though out the entire film.

Degree- 2:1

Finally the franchise has gone back to the basics that made

it so successful to begin with. This is a film that even those who

don’t like the comics may enjoy as it focuses more on plot than CGI.

(If you are confused about the rating system please click on the ‘About This Blog Page’ which will explain it all)

Hanna

Coming out in May is the modern day twisted fairy tale ‘Hannah’, directed by British Director Joe Wright and starring Eric Bana, Cate Blanchett and young ‘Atonement’ and ‘The Lovely Bones’ star Saoirse Ronan. The film centers around Ronan’s character Hanna and how she is trained by her father (Bana) to kill an intelligence agent (Blanchett).  From the trailer the film looks to be filled with action, but with such a great cast it is more than likely that there will be an exciting plot as well. Think ‘Bourne Identity’ except Jason Bourne is a 16 year-old blonde girl with more of a killer instinct.

R.E.D

reviewed by guest lecturer Will Tooke

Another month brings out another comic book adaption. The playful, immersive odyssey of Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World and the subversive, ultra violent thrill ride of Kick-Ass are still fresh in my mind, I went to see RED with high hopes – after all, with an incredible cast of Bruce Willis, Morgan Freeman, John Malkovich and your Grans favourite, Helen Mirren, what could possibly go wrong? Err, well, quite a lot actually.

Based on the DC comic written by Warren Ellis and the unfortunately named Cully Hamner, this movie version of RED is similar in name only. A cursory Google (I hadn’t heard of RED before either…) revealed that the scriptwriters had changed quite a bit. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a purist – one of the greatest things about good movie adaptation of novels or books is how the screenwriter handles the source material. Think of 2001s About A Boy based on Nick Hornby’s novel. Gone – thank God – is the heavy handed, zeitgeisty sub-plot to do with Kurt Kobain’s death, a reason why it stands as an example where the film is better than the book. Of course, film adaptations don’t always work out for the best – 2009s Watchmen suffered terribly from an overlong script, and the fact that for some reason it never quite managed to live up to the spirit of the dystopian epic that is Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ 1986 graphic novel. Yes, screenwriting – particularly adapting works – is a difficult game indeed, one that demands subtlety in approach if not content.

The fact then that screenwriters Jon and Erich Hoeber take great big blundering axe chops to the original is a bad sign. Bruce Willis’ character, ex-CIA agent Frank Moses, survives from the original lineup. The rest are all new additions. Whereas the comic is apparently a darker, straighter story of murky political intrigue and shady secret service dealings, on celluloid RED is a much lighter, family friendly affair. It is, after all a 12 A, and I can’t help wonder if somewhere in the ether floats a grittier, original script, more faithful to the original, before the studio talked it down from an 18 or a 15 to a 12 certificate. It’s a real shame actually, because the core idea is a good one – old spooks come out of retirement to kick some butt after someone or other tries to have them killed. The cheap and easy way to make this family friendly of course is to a) have curiously bloodless fight scenes and b) add some humour.

Oh sweet Jesus, the humour.

In a big loud dumb action movies, there is nothing wrong with a few jokes. Brucie’s own Die Hard quadrilogy is the stronger for them, and cheesy jokes and lazy innuendo pretty much substituted plot for much of Roger Moore’s stint as Bond. But in RED, the cheesy jokes are ladled on like fondue. And it just gets incredibly annoying, right up to a silly pre-credits scene that sees Brucie wheeling John Malkovich through a Moldovan minefield in a wheelbarrow, whilst the latter clutches a nuclear bomb. Typing that out, it sounds pretty funny, like something out of under rated Cold War farce Top Secret! (Seriously, you must see it before you die), but after a few hours of cutesy posturing, my sense of humour failure was borderline terminal.

And even if the awful jokes had been exorcised from RED, I’m not so sure it’d have worked, either. The plot has more flabby twists than Ann Widdecombe’s routines on Strictly Come Dancing: to the extent that it’s unforgivably hard to follow, which is why I haven’t mentioned what happens so much. ‘So wait, now that guy isn’t a baddie?’ one little boy sat near me in the cinema said out loud, to no one in particular. His guess is as good as mine, frankly.  The story circles around something about the covering up of something bad that the now Vice President of the United States (perhaps?) did in Guatemala in 1981 whilst he was in the army. Now bearing in mind said V.P is played by Nip Tuck’s Julian McMahon, this is particularly hard to swallow seeing as McMahon would have been 13 in 1981. Yup, that particular plot hole bugged me so much, I looked up an actor’s actual birthday, just to give me something else to complain about.

I suppose I should provide a bit of a balance by saying that parts of the film are OK – the sight of Helen Mirren firing a huge machine is funny for a bit, and the whole thing is filmed well, each shot framed like a comic book pane. Bruce Willis does his trusty trademark ‘McClane smirk’ – the same facial expression since the good old days of Die Hard, back when Brucey had hair. The same smirk Brucey has done in pretty much every film he’s been in since 1986. If Bella Lugosi was cinema’s Man of a Thousand Faces, then Willis has become cinema’s Man of Just One Smirk. I’m being harsh on Brucey, he does the hand-to-hand combat fights very well, and as a protagonist he’s hard not to like. It’s just I can’t remember the last time he was truly stretched in a role. Perhaps in The Sixth Sense? Which was also the last time M. Night Shyamalan made a decent film. And that was a long, long time ago. In any case, the few good points don’t make up for the whole – in the same way that the excellent German motorway system doesn’t excuse the regime that created them.

I suppose the biggest crime is that this is perhaps the greatest example of recent cinema of a truly brilliant cast who are truly wasted. In the opening credits, there is literally not one actors name that popped up that I didn’t recognize and who isn’t good. Alongside the main four stars are Brian Cox, Karl Urban – two veterans of the Bourne Trilogy, as well as James Remar from TVs Dexter, Mary-Louise Parker from Weeds, Richard Dreyfuss, and the 93 year old Ernest Borgnine. I can only presume they were very well paid or just don’t care anymore.

Degree-2.2 If you like your films with lots bullets that pass in slow motion making a

WOOOSH noise, explosions that seemingly compete with plot holes

to see which one can be the biggest, then you’ll love this.  Otherwise you should probably

just stay away.

It narrowly escaped a third solely because Helen Mirren fires a big loud machine gun.

(If you are confused about the rating system please click on the ‘About This Blog Page’ which will explain it all)

 

R.E.D-A few little clips

Here are some fun clips from R.E.D that I stumbled across. They are nothing particularly new, but you get to see Helen Mirren wield that machine gun again and many more things besides. I really think she will be the best bit of the movie-enjoy!

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World

Scott Pilgrim is certainly aimed at a very specific niche, which would explain its US box office flop, only making $30 million back on its $60 million budget. The source material was written for slackers about slackers, not geeks or teenagers, but slackers, which isolates a lot of the movie going public. With all this in mind I still highly recommend everyone to go and see it, even if the genre is not inside your comfort zone, as it is a truly amazing film.

The movie (so the avid fans say) sticks close to the original comics, ok ‘graphic novels’, by Bryan Lee O’Malley.  In these novels Scott Pilgrim (Michael Cera), the base guitarist for the unsigned band ‘Sex Bob-omb’, falls head over heels for the enigmatic Ramona Flowers (Mary Elizabeth Winstead). However to be with her Scott must first defeat her seven evil exes who all want to kick the crap out of him. It’s the relationship between Scott and Ramona that is the core of the film and the different dynamics in it are what make this film score high points. Between all the great visuals, dialogue and music (which I will get onto in a second) the film looks at real, relatable issues, if in a surreal setting. With Scott we see all the usual insecurity each of us feels when we start dating a new person: awkward, obsessed, nervous, cocky, doubtful. Scott goes through all these stages and we go through them with him. And with Ramona we witness what it is like running away from your past, but never fully escaping and having it come back to hurt those around you instead. Winstead does a great job making Ramona seem both strong and fragile at the same time, apologetic for her past, but not regretful.

A film with this many layers might be a surprise for a comic (sorry graphic novel) based movie, but it certainly isn’t for an Edgar Wright film. Both his previous movies, ‘Hot Fuzz’ and ‘Shaun Of The Dead’, had many layers of heart beneath the comedy. However Wright has certainly pulled away from his old British team of Simon Pegg and Nick Frost in order to have an all American and Canadian cast. It also has a far larger budget that is put to good use. The entire film is a fusion of 80s video games and retro comics. The scenes shift and change as if you were reading a comic book, which can disorientate viewers at first, but trust me sticking around is worth it. The fights themselves are taken straight from video games such as ‘Street Fighter’, being both fast paced and intense, but lasting for the exact right amount of time. The timing of the film is absolutely perfect, with neither action nor dialogue going on for too long or becoming tired. The sound track is also as explosive as the fight scenes, even for one who is more comfortable with the top 40 than indie rock. Legendary alt-rock artist Beck wrote all of Sex Bob-omb’s songs while Canadian musicians Metric and Broken Social Scene penned the tracks for the other bands. The playlist is so good that a 2-CD soundtrack has been released and has got acclaimed reviews.

Even with all these great qualities, what truly makes ‘Scott Pilgrim Vs the World’ an exceptional film is the great cast and dialogue. Michael Cera is still playing the same slightly dorky character he has played in ‘Juno’ and ‘Super Bad’, but this time the character is also a douche. This grumpy, self-centred attitude that Scott often displays makes the character all the more real and believable and Michael Cera’s charm wins you over to rooting for him in every fight. As I’ve already mentioned Winstead is perfection, even under all the colourful wigs she had to wear. However, what most stands out is how rounded the supporting characters are. Each evil ex feels complete even though some only get a few seconds of screen time. Easily the two best exes were Chris Evan’s Lucas Lee and Brandon Routh’s Todd Ingman who each deliver hilarious performances. But the characters that rise above everyone else are Wallace (Kieran Culkin) and Knives Chau (Ellen Wong).  Wallace is Scott’s gay flatmate and is rare in the fact that he is not gay first and everything else second. Instead Wallace is witty, likable and insightful before being gay. Knives Chau on the other hand is the most lovable character you meet through the entire 112 minutes. Knives is the 17 year old school girl that Scott is dating when he meets Ramona and her bubbly, naïve, adoring attitude almost makes you want Scott to not bother with Ramona at all. Wong certainly provides the warm fuzzy feeling of the film. As for the script it is top notch with every character getting at least one funny line; except Shota Saito and Keita Saito who are twin actors from Japan and don’t speak any English. From one-liners, such as the ‘Hasbian’ insult, to topical jokes, such as the Vegan police, the script is both playful and insightful, lacking in neither imagination nor charm.

Ultimately Scott Pilgrim is a growing up story that has real heart and flare. Between the fights and the music is a clever, funny, moving story that deserves to gross higher than it has done in the States. However, even if it doesn’t do as well here as it should do, if you go see it and you like it you can feel good in the knowledge that you like a cool trendy film that will reach cult status in only a few years.

Degree: 1^st

A film that is not going to be to everyone’s taste, but is

still awesome. It has all the makings of a cult classic.

R.E.D

Dame Helen Mirren with a machine gun? This will spike anyone’s interest. When asked why she chose to do the film, Mirren’s first response was ‘It’s not the Queen’ and she is certainly right about that. With the great veteran cast Morgan Freeman, Bruce Willis and John Malkovich Mirren is in very good company.

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

The Prince of Persia started life as a critically acclaimed video game in 1989 and has since become a huge franchise that has spread across two decades and several different mediums from graphic novels to next generation consoles. Now, it hits the big screen. The new film, The Prince ofPersia: The Sands of Time, is set to be the summer blockbuster to rival Marvel’s Iron Man 2 and it certainly has all the usual trappings of an action-adventure flick. We have an attractive male protagonist, Dastan (Gyllenhaal), who with the help of an equally attractive love interest, Princess Tamina (Arterton), must defeat the less attractive antagonist, Nizam (Kingsley). Between the opening and ending credits Dastan will travel around Persia, create a mismatched group of followers and be a part of some impressive fight scenes; if this all sounds familiar to you then you are likely to have seen the producer’s other big hit The Pirates of the Caribbean. However, though Prince of Persia sounds as if it is cut from the same cloth, it sadly falls short of what Pirates of the Caribbean achieved. The characters are not as developed, the settings not as compelling and the plot not as engaging.

Although Gyllenhaal portrays a far more competent and interesting character than Orlando Bloom’s Will Turner (who ironically was rumoured to have been originally playing this part) he isn’t as entertaining or as dynamic as Johnny Depp’s Jack Sparrow. Arterton’s Princess Tamina also falls short of being an impressive heroine; the flirtatious bickering between Dastan and Tamina is not only typical of Hollywood blockbusters, but it’s rather poorly executed. Instead of coming across as strong, independent and free thinking Tamina simply seems annoying and whiney. Location also causes gripes. Set in Persia, but filmed in Morocco, the movie jumps quickly from one location to another without properly showing the beauty of the landscape. Sadly it seems that Morocco will look more impressive in Sarah-Jessica Parker’s up-and-coming chick-flick Sex and the City 2 than it did here. Along with jumpy scenes, the plot bounded from location to location and fight to fight with very little congruency or tension. The premise of the film is explained within the first 40 minutes and the audience is given no new surprises.

Despite these deficiencies, the film is not without merit. It provides a lot for lovers of action; the fight scenes are well choreographed with many acrobatic tricks accompanying each sword fight. There is also an element of free running introduced to the film which is a subtle homage to the game the movie is based on. And the sequence of rewinding time is a particularly impressive feature of the film; this beautifully crafted CGI sequence is the one bit of originality in the movie. All together the sequences took a year and a half to finish, but visually it was worth every second. However, these tiny moments are not enough to redeem the rest of the 116 minute running time; anyone who is being dragged to see it should go on Orange Wednesday when at least their ticket will be free.

Degree: 3rd

A dumb action flick that delivers in special effects, but lacks in characterisation,

script and everything else important in a good film.